Universal ADA compliance engagement

Accessibility remediation scope for codebases, products, and public sites.

The same process applies across healthcare, e-commerce, SaaS, public sector, and documentation-heavy properties: secure codebase access, manual WCAG 2.2 AA auditing, code-level remediation, retesting, documentation, and ongoing release control.

WCAG audit report document with issue summaries on a conference table
DigitxlLink accessibility checklist printed on a document with checked audit items on a desk
Engagement scope

What the engagement covers

Every project starts the same way: access to the real codebase and environments, manual auditing of the actual user journeys, prioritized code fixes, validation, and a documented path toward compliance.

Codebase Access & Installation

We start with repository access, staging or local environment setup, dependency install, authenticated routes, and any deployment context required to review the real product instead of screenshots or surface-level markup.

Repository access
Staging or local
Build dependencies
Authenticated states
Codebase access scope
Manual Audit & Issue Logging

We run manual WCAG 2.2 AA review across keyboard flows, screen reader behavior, structure, forms, dialogs, errors, tables, media, and motion to document the issues that actually block users.

Keyboard review
Screen reader testing
WCAG issue log
Component inventory
Manual audit scope
Code-Level Remediation

Findings are converted into actionable engineering work: semantic HTML, ARIA corrections, focus management, accessible names, form recovery, status messaging, and reusable component fixes.

Semantic fixes
Focus management
Forms and errors
Component repair
Code remediation scope
Validation & Documentation

After implementation, we retest the repaired surface, confirm closure, and package the supporting documentation your team needs for internal tracking, stakeholder review, and external requests.

Retesting
Closure evidence
Compliance notes
Statement support
Validation scope
Ongoing Compliance Support

Accessibility has to survive future releases. We support regression review, release checkpoints, design system governance, and recurring validation so fixes do not decay after launch.

Release review
Regression control
Design system rules
Monitoring cadence
Ongoing compliance scope
Delivery timeline

What a typical remediation schedule looks like

Most remediation scopes land in 5-10 business days once access is granted. Smaller sites with fewer unique pages and templates often close faster.

Codebase access confirmed dashboard with repository and staging checklist
Days 1-2
Kickoff, access, and scope lock

We secure repository or CMS access, verify staging, collect test accounts, and lock the exact templates, components, and user journeys included in the first remediation pass.

Kickoff and scope lock
Repository and staging access
Environment verification
Page and flow list confirmed
Accessibility audit issue log with screenshots severity and remediation notes
Days 2-4
Manual audit and issue logging

The agreed templates and priority user journeys are reviewed against WCAG 2.2 AA, with every defect logged alongside screenshots, severity, code context, and the exact remediation requirement.

Annotated issue log
Severity and effort ranking
Component-level patterns
Fix backlog approved
Code remediation workstation with staging QA checklist
Days 4-10
Code remediation and staging QA

Once the backlog is approved, fixes move directly into code. Shared components are corrected first, then page-specific issues are cleared in staging and rechecked as they land.

Component fixes shipped
Page issues cleared
Staging QA rechecks
Client review checkpoints
Final validation evidence package and stakeholder handoff checklist
Days 10-14
Final validation and handoff

We complete closure testing, package the evidence set, and hand off final status. Smaller sites often reach this stage inside the first week, while broader page counts still stay inside a two-week window.

Manual closure retest
Updated evidence package
Stakeholder handoff review
Post-launch monitoring plan
Core artifacts

The documents and controls every engagement produces

The work is not just an audit. It is a traceable remediation program with access control, issue logging, engineering direction, retest evidence, and governance for future releases.

What your team receives

A professional ADA engagement ends with more than a PDF. It leaves your team with a working backlog, validated fixes, and the documentation needed to support compliance claims.

Audit, remediation, validation. one compliance path.

If your team can provide codebase and environment access, the engagement can move from scope to manual audit, code-level fixes, retesting, and documentation without breaking continuity.

Scope image