Skip to main content
Built for legal, medical, and engineering review.

We audit your code, not your overlay.

Manual WCAG 2.2 AA audits, code-level remediation, assistive technology validation, and procurement evidence for healthcare, SaaS, and high-risk digital systems. Built for Section 508, EN 301 549, EAA readiness, and ACR or VPAT support.

Request a discovery call
Professional portrait of a healthcare compliance leader
“DigitxlLink identified structural accessibility failures across our site that exposed us to significant legal risk. They delivered a complete remediation plan with code-level implementation support and compliance documentation within two weeks.”
David Reinhardt
General Counsel, Meridian Legal Group
Professional portrait of a product engineering leader
Structural accessibility work designed to reduce barriers and support documented conformance efforts.
Why DigitxlLink

Accessibility engineering for high-risk digital systems

Manual WCAG 2.2 AA audits and code-level remediation for teams that need scope-aware conformance evidence.

Request a discovery call
Manual

Testing approach

4,000+

Annual ADA cases

2.2 AA

WCAG target

Accessibility specialist reviewing a WCAG 2.2 audit and remediation dashboard
Audit deeply.
Fix structurally.
Validate manually.
Document everything.
Ship with evidence.
Maintain accessibility.
Audit deeply.
Fix structurally.
Validate manually.
Document everything.
Ship with evidence.
Maintain accessibility.
Deliverables

A structured path to improved accessibility

Three defined phases — Audit, Remediation, and Validation — with every finding tracked to validated closure.

Request a discovery call
Manual WCAG Audit

Page-by-page screen reader validation, keyboard-only navigation mapping, and contrast analysis — every finding severity-ranked and mapped to specific WCAG 2.2 AA criteria.

Code-Level Remediation

Structural fixes implemented directly in your production codebase. Semantic HTML corrections, ARIA engineering, focus management, contrast, and form labeling — no overlays, no widgets.

Scope-aware Documentation

Remediation log, validation results, and scope-aware documentation prepared for stakeholder, procurement, or counsel review.

Review-Ready Evidence

Structured findings and remediation evidence document what was tested, fixed, retested, and left open within the agreed scope.

Screen Reader + Keyboard Validation

NVDA testing, keyboard-only path mapping, focus state verification, and interaction checks across critical user journeys.

Risk Identification

Issue logs expose accessibility failures before they turn into demand letters, procurement blockers, or production regressions.

Industry Focus

Accessibility remediation where legal exposure is highest

Healthcare platforms, SaaS products, checkout flows, and procurement-sensitive systems audited and remediated to WCAG 2.2 AA.

View ADA Case Library
Healthcare Platforms

Patient portals, intake flows, scheduling interfaces, and form-heavy experiences audited for structural accessibility risk.

Patient portals
Appointment scheduling
Form accessibility
Screen reader support
Healthcare details
E-Commerce Checkouts

Keyboard navigation, form error handling, focus order, and transaction flows remediated across high-conversion checkout journeys.

Cart flows
Payment forms
Keyboard repair
Checkout validation
View Scope
SaaS Products

Dashboards, dialogs, landmark structure, and component states fixed directly in production codebases used by enterprise buyers.

Dashboards
ARIA landmarks
Modal focus management
Component states
View Scope
Documentation & Privacy Notice Review

Conformance statements, validation records, remediation logs, and procurement-ready evidence packages for counsel and buyers.

Conformance statements
Validation evidence
Counsel review
ACR/VPAT support
View Scope
Ongoing Accessibility Support

Retesting, release reviews, and ongoing accessibility guidance for teams that need accessibility work maintained after launch.

Retesting
Release reviews
Issue monitoring
Accessibility guidance
View Scope
Handoff documentation

What stays with your team

Every item is tied to a page, component, or workflow. Your team can see what failed, why it matters, what changed, and whether the fix passed retesting.

Finding log

Steps to reproduce, user impact, severity, WCAG reference, and supporting evidence.

Fix notes

The recommended or implemented change, its owner, and the affected component.

Retest record

Resolved, partial, blocked, or still open, along with the release that was tested.

Delivered for the agreed scopeSee a sample finding
Our Methodology

Audit, remediation, validation, documentation

Three defined phases — Audit, Remediation, and Validation — with every finding tracked to validated closure.

Audit
01
Audit

Manual testing across templates, flows, and interactive components.

Manual page-by-page testing
NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver, TalkBack
Keyboard-only mapping
Contrast analysis
Remediation
02
Remediation

Structural fixes implemented directly in your production codebase.

Semantic HTML corrections
ARIA engineering
Focus management repairs
Form labeling
03
Validation

Post-remediation testing confirms every fix against WCAG 2.2 AA criteria.

Critical journey retesting
NVDA verification
Keyboard flow sign-off
Severity closure
04
Documentation

Evidence packages prepared for counsel, procurement, and internal compliance review.

Remediation log
Validation results
Conformance statement
Good-faith documentation

Engagements built around your compliance risk

Start with findings, add remediation, or keep compliance current as your site changes.

Audit & Report
From $1,500

For organizations that need a professional WCAG 2.2 AA audit, prioritized findings, and a developer-ready remediation roadmap. Up to 5 core pages or templates.

Manual WCAG 2.2 AA review of agreed scope
Automated testing
Manual accessibility testing
Prioritized remediation roadmap
Executive summary
Developer-ready issue tickets
Optional VPAT / ACR documentation (add-on)
Request an Audit Quote
Most Popular
Audit + Remediation
From $3,500

For teams that want the audit and approved remediation work handled by the same technical team. Up to 5 core pages or templates on standard platforms; custom applications and third-party systems are scoped separately.

Everything in Audit & Report
Hands-on code remediation
Fixes completed by our team
Post-remediation re-test
Scope-aware validation summary
Validation and limitations record
30-day follow-up window for completed fixes
Stakeholder handoff session
Get a Project Quote
Ongoing Accessibility Support
From $500/mo

Keep accessibility work current as your site changes. Monitoring starts at $500/mo; the Accessibility Partnership tier with manual spot-checks starts at $750/mo. Available after an audit or remediation engagement.

Monthly accessibility monitoring
Monthly accessibility status report
New content and feature review
Quarterly manual spot-checks (Partnership tier)
Accessibility statement updates
Priority remediation support (Partnership tier)
Optional VPAT / ACR maintenance
Talk to Us About Ongoing Support
Sample audit handoff

A finding your team can actually use.

We do not hand over a scanner export. Each issue explains the barrier, shows the evidence, names the affected component, and gives the team a practical next step.

Example finding

Success message is not announced

Open
User impact
After submitting an appointment request, screen reader users may receive no confirmation.
Evidence
NVDA + Chrome · keyboard review
WCAG
4.1.3 Status Messages
Owner
Appointment form component
Recommended direction

Place the confirmation inside a persistent role="status" region so assistive technology announces the update without moving focus unnecessarily.

Example structure only. This is not client data or a claimed result. Final deliverables follow the written scope.

What teams need before risk turns into work

This section covers the three things leadership usually asks first: what creates exposure, what engineering needs ready, and what records exist once remediation is complete.

See legal guidance
Common accessibility failures that trigger ADA complaints
Legal risk
Failure patterns
Issues that trigger complaints first

Keyboard traps, broken focus states, unlabeled inputs, and inaccessible checkout or intake flows are where legal pressure usually starts.

Review risk patterns
What engineering teams should have ready before remediation begins
Kickoff
Engineering readiness
What needs to be ready before work starts

Access, staging, test accounts, priority flows, and release ownership are what determine how fast a remediation window can actually move.

See kickoff needs
Compliance records created at the end of remediation
Evidence
Post-fix records
What gets documented once fixes close

Closed issue logs, validation notes, retest records, and handoff evidence give counsel and procurement teams a traceable record to review.

Review handoff records

Frequently asked questions

Answers to common questions about ADA risk, structural remediation, and accessibility documentation.

Request a discovery call
Can my business actually get sued over website accessibility?

Yes. Over 20,000 ADA-related website lawsuits were filed between 2020 and 2024, with more than 4,000 cases per year in recent years. Many businesses face ADA website-accessibility claims, and courts, regulators, and settlement activity continue to treat inaccessible digital experiences as serious legal risk — especially when tied to public-facing goods, services, forms, appointments, checkout flows, or physical business locations. Businesses of any size can receive demand letters or face litigation. A documented accessibility program can help teams show what was tested, fixed, and still requires attention; legal conclusions should be reviewed with qualified counsel.

Do you provide code fixes or just a report?

Both. The Audit Only engagement delivers a complete findings report with remediation guidance. The Audit + Remediation engagement includes direct code-level fixes in your production codebase — semantic HTML corrections, ARIA engineering, focus management, contrast adjustments, and interaction repairs.

Why not use an accessibility overlay instead?

Automated tools and overlays may identify or alter some issues, but they do not establish that a site is accessible. Manual testing and source-level remediation address barriers in the actual components and user journeys.

Can the documentation support legal or procurement review?

You receive structured findings, remediation evidence, validation results, and a scope-and-limitations record prepared for counsel or procurement review. These materials document the work performed; they are not legal advice and do not guarantee compliance or protection from a claim.

How long does a typical engagement take?

Audit-only work is typically planned for 5–10 business days. Audit + Remediation is commonly planned for 2–4 weeks. These are planning ranges, not guarantees; the written scope controls based on template count, application complexity, access, third-party systems, and approval cycles.

What do you test during a manual audit?

Manual page-by-page testing, NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver, TalkBack, keyboard-only navigation mapping, contrast analysis, form labeling, semantic structure, zoom behavior, and interaction states — all severity-ranked and mapped to WCAG 2.2 AA, Section 508, EN 301 549, and EAA readiness needs.

Do you work with counsel or procurement teams?

Yes. We provide remediation logs, validation results, conformance documentation, and ACR or VPAT support, Section 508 and EN 301 549 mapping, EAA readiness notes, and procurement evidence for counsel, enterprise buyers, or regulatory review.

Audit, remediation, and accessibility support

Bring accessibility into scope. We will help you choose the right next step.

Whether you need a WCAG audit, source-level fixes, ACR or VPAT documentation, or ongoing accessibility support, we will map the work, timeline, and evidence your team needs.

Request a discovery call
Team workspace for accessibility planning and compliance support
Request a discovery call
WCAG 2.2 AA
View Services
WCAG 2.2 Guide