01 · FindingOpen
Sample finding record
- ID
- DLX-DEMO-001
- Barrier
- Appointment confirmation is not announced.
- Reproduced with
- Keyboard and NVDA
- Patient impact
- A screen reader user may not know whether the appointment request succeeded.
Founder-led WCAG remediation
Accessibility expertise backed by real engineering.
DigitxlLink helps organizations audit and remediate digital products at the source code level, with WCAG evidence, practical fixes, and documentation teams can stand behind.
IAAP CPACCWCAG 2.2 Level AASection 508EN 301 549
Founder-led
Built from development. Focused on accessibility.
Our work connects product engineering, WCAG review, remediation, and documentation so teams can ship fixes that hold up.
CodeSource-level fixesNo overlay dependency
WCAG2.2 Level AA validationEvidence
HandoffReports teams can useReady
Why DigitxlLink exists
Accessibility work built from an engineering foundation.
DigitxlLink exists because accessibility is too often discovered late, separated from engineering, or reduced to a scan that leaves product teams to interpret the result. The company grew from full-stack web and mobile development, where performance, maintainability, component behavior, and release quality already had to be solved inside the product.
That background shapes the accessibility practice. A missing announcement, broken keyboard path, or inaccessible form state is not treated as an abstract checklist item. It is reproduced in the user’s workflow, traced to the responsible markup, component, state logic, content, or integration, and documented in language the people who own the system can act on.
Engagements begin by defining the journeys, templates, and interaction states in scope. DigitxlLink combines manual review, assistive-technology validation, and code inspection to identify barriers and explain their user impact. Approved fixes are implemented at the source or translated into practical engineering guidance, then the original interaction is repeated against the corrected release.
The work closes with a traceable record: the finding, the change, the retest result, any remaining boundary, and the handoff needed for future releases. That path—from identification through remediation, retesting, and documentation—is why DigitxlLink approaches accessibility as ongoing product engineering rather than overlay-dependent remediation or an automated-only exercise.
Remediation walkthrough
Follow one accessibility barrier from failed interaction to verified fix.
Levi reproduces the barrier, traces it to the affected code, implements the correction, retests the original interaction, and documents the result for handoff.
Demonstration environment. No client data or claimed client result.
- 01
Reproduce the barrier
In a synthetic appointment workflow, the confirmation appears visually after keyboard submission but is not announced by NVDA. The finding is opened with the patient impact and exact steps recorded.
- 02
Trace the affected component
The review follows the submit event into the appointment-confirmation component and confirms that the status message is inserted without a persistent programmatic status region.
- 03
Implement the source-level correction
A persistent status region is present before submission, and the confirmed appointment message is written into it after the request succeeds.
- 04
Retest and close the record
The identical keyboard and NVDA interaction is repeated. The announcement is verified, the finding changes from Open to Resolved, and the release-specific handoff is recorded.
Connected demonstration artifacts
One finding stays traceable from evidence through handoff.
The same synthetic appointment-confirmation barrier appears in each record below so engineering, accessibility, and review teams can follow the decision trail.
Demonstration environment. No client data or claimed client result.
02 · ImplementationComponent located
Before-and-after code diff
The visual message existed only after submission. The correction keeps a status region in the component before the request completes.
- {confirmed && <p>Appointment confirmed</p>}+ <p role="status" aria-live="polite">+ {confirmationMessage}+ </p>03 · ValidationResolved
Retest result
- Interaction
- The identical keyboard submission is repeated.
- Assistive technology
- NVDA announces “Appointment confirmed” after success.
- Regression check
- Focus remains on the submit control and the visible confirmation remains present.
- Status change
- Open → Resolved
04 · HandoffRelease record
Closure and handoff record
- Owner
- Appointment workflow engineering
- Correction
- Persistent polite status region in the confirmation component
- Evidence
- Reproduction steps, source change, NVDA retest, and resolved status
- Boundary
- Result applies to the demonstrated build and interaction only.
Engagement accountability
Clear ownership from repository access through handoff.
Levi remains the primary point of accountability for scope, communication, and delivery. If additional specialist support is proposed, access and responsibilities are disclosed before work begins.
Direct, senior-level communicationYou know who owns the work, who can access your environment, and who is responsible for the final handoff.
Agree on access before work starts
Repository, staging, vendor, and production access are discussed during scoping. Confidentiality and NDA requirements can be addressed before credentials are shared.
Use the least access required
Work is structured around the smallest practical permission set, with staging or isolated environments used when the engagement allows.
Keep changes reviewable
Code changes can move through dedicated branches, pull requests, and the client’s existing review process rather than bypassing engineering controls.
Close access and hand off the record
At completion, the team receives the agreed documentation and remaining-risk notes, and temporary access can be removed through the client’s normal process.
Credentials and practice
Accessibility knowledge that translates into implementation.
A verified accessibility credential, a clear technical benchmark, and product engineering experience that helps move findings into maintainable code.
Verified credentialIAAP
CPACC
Certified Professional in Accessibility Core Competencies
Foundation-level expertise across disability models, accessibility standards, universal design, and inclusive practice.
Issued byInternational Association of Accessibility Professionals
Technical benchmark
WCAG 2.2 Level AA
Findings, remediation guidance, and validation are mapped to the criteria included in the agreed scope.
Capabilities supporting the work
Manual accessibility testing
Keyboard, screen reader, contrast, content, and component-state review beyond automated scans.
Full-stack remediation
Practical guidance across interfaces, application logic, integrations, and reusable component systems.
Web, mobile, and UX
Responsive sites, product workflows, mobile interaction patterns, and user-centered interface decisions.
Delivery and documentation
Scope control, ownership, implementation notes, validation records, and stakeholder-ready handoff.
Questions clients usually ask before an engagement.
A few practical details about scope, standards, remediation, and handoff.
Next step
Send the engagement directly to Levi.
Bring the journeys, components, release concerns, or accessibility complaints that already have your team’s attention. The first pass is practical, founder-led, and focused on what needs to change.
